Frequently-Asked Questions

How are Virus-Avoidance Strategies a national security threat?

Put simply, Virus-Avoidance Strategies lead to more deadly airborne disease, which is a threat in terms of more deaths, to any country that enacts such ill-conceived policies.

But, the biggest threat is their effect on the economy - not necessarily in terms of money and wealth, but in terms of food and shelter. Already, we've seen in countries like Chile, events where the military in Santiago have been put in a position of fighting the poor, who have found themselves without jobs, and are unable to feed their families. They have been forced into uprisings, rather than being able to simply show up for their jobs every day, to make a living.

These types of uprisings will occur in every country, once the money to pay for Virus-Avoidance Strategies runs out, as it eventually will everywhere.

Virus-Avoidance Strategies also set up a dynamic where wealthy countries will destroy their cultures and societies, while causing tens of thousands of additional deaths due to deadlier viruses, as poorer countries that cannot afford Virus-Avoidance Strategies will emerge with their countries relatively unscathed due to viruses, but destabilized by economic issues from abroad.

In 2001, Osama Bin Laden went through all manner of machinations in order to kill just a handful of Americans, leaving the West largely unscathed.

Now, all of Western Civilization could be destroyed by simply promoting a series of bad cold seasons, exploiting this new attitude of people considering themselves to be too good to get the common cold.

The only way out is to admit that the method we've always used to handle cold seasons is not merely the best way, but the only possible way.